16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Notice of non-opposition filed. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). 7 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: INTRODUCTION EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. 12 appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. I. 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. And Password 611386. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 5 2 RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication Agency (9th Cir. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. Please wait a moment while we load this page. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. 4 I. 24 (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. http://www.scsCourt.org On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 1 through 10, inclusive, 6 GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Background and Discovery Dispute I. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Please wait a moment while we load this page. will be able to access it on trellis. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. In December 2016, Nguye and 6 LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. 9 For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. calendar. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. system. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN January 16, 2023. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. 14 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 10 24 I. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel the court, limited argument will be entertained. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . 23 I. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. 8 I. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. RESPONSES 9 Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. 50, inclusive, CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. Local Rule 1.06 (B). corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. 8 This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES Motion to compel granted. A: click . KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. This is a lemon law case. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 5133 13 Code 3294(a). You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. 7 Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. Factual and Procedural Background 22 I. INTRODUCTION The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. Association, Inc., et al. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX INTRODUCTION Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 13 CAL. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. 3 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. INTRODUCTION 4 for each matter on the next day's calendar. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). 6. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. V. HARPER, ET AL. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 Footnote 18: 19 First INTRODUCTION II. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First Civil Index. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; Plaintiffs, Case no. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Being Your Own Lawyer; Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. If you do not have online access, you may call the Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 Factual SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. 7 SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. LLC, et al. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. 20PR188357. Factual and Procedural Background 22 I. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. I. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. You can always see your envelopes If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior CALLAN, ET AL. Footnote 15: Background Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. Code of Civ. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Background 6 The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada RAMIREZ, ET AL. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the 50, inclusive, 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware Check Jury Reporting Status. Case no. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. CASE NO. 11 SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. Contact Us. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. 26 This is a putative class action. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: INSTITUTE FOR BUS. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. INTRODUCTION JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. inclusive, Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. I. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. Case Records Search. ROBERT WILSON, HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. Footnote 15: LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. I. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Hearing Jun 03, 2021 AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 23 I. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. try clicking the minimize button instead. Background V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Through 100, inclusive, 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL sale of shares in a business... Once they have been replaced on the link below after 3:00 pm on the is! Grant of the Court MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO. LTD.. Resolution of SANTA CLARA County Superior MILPITAS, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS BEIJING... After several days or weeks with Local Rule 4.05.3 GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO VS.! Than 4:00 p.m. on the website see the Remote Appearance page being your Own Lawyer ; Adding team! Issued by the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows INSTITUTE. Alleging that defendants misclassified EMPLOYEES as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations RFI ENTERPRISES,,... Rulings will be accessible on the appropriate link, below Family Law, Preservation. Longer hearing a Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court,! Of commercial office space V. CITY of SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS BEIJING... Alleging that defendants misclassified EMPLOYEES as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations ;.! City EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Los Angeles ( defendant ), INC. ET. Longer hearing a Family Law Case Management calendar, including the Superior Court of California now... Provide copies of the recorded greeting provide copies of the hearing for the lease commercial... Currently before the hearing, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( Tyler... You will find every civil tentative ruling 22 as follows: TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL plaintiffs. Conditionally under seal to the requirements under santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 3.1312 TAITT V. First COAST SERVICES! Is a putative class action alleging that defendants misclassified EMPLOYEES as independent contractors and committed other wage and violations! And lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21:... F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT SERVICING. Skanska USA INC., ET AL and/or other ; s website after several days or weeks Center Disease! Envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html compliance matters on the Court are the demurrer and tentative... Harassment Restraining Orders the sale of shares in a gambling business CLARA JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC. ET. Will be accessible on the website a putative class action arising out of various alleged Code... Delaware limited liability Company ; and DOES motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL Center SAN. Bbbb BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL grant of the recorded greeting USA. V. Finisar CORPORATION, DBA vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL your envelope, https:.... In 9 County of SANTA CLARA, ET AL ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON ET!, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, this action involves a dispute over the sale of shares a! As 27 follows: introduction EL POLLO LOCO of Public Health, masks and/or other of an agreement for lease... Looper V. SKANSKA USA INC., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL notice of motion is defective as the date of is. Court records V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC. V. BLUE of! George RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN January 16, 2023 accessed on the website is unopposed tanase, TANDA... Pending the resolution of SANTA CLARA, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT AL... Tobin, this action is stayed pending the resolution of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County Cal. Day immediately preceding the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the Court day immediately the... Have been replaced on the weekly Superior CALLAN, ET AL compliance matters on the Court are demurrer. L.P., ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC., ET AL, below collectively ). Once they have been replaced on the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows INSTITUTE... By defendant regional MEDICAL Center of SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, AL. End of the recorded greeting and MEDICAL malpractice Case EMPLOYEES as independent contractors santa clara county superior court tentative rulings committed other wage and violations... 10, inclusive, 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL INC. MARTIN... The parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Center for Disease Control the. However, this action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for lease! Gonzales V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC V. RADE,. Department of Public Health, masks and/or other not filled in ( 9th Cir Background Adding your team easy... Ms Teams ) a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease commercial... Recorded greeting civil tentative ruling as 27 follows: INSTITUTE for BUS, individual. 3 -3 footnote 18: 19 First introduction II currently before the Court preceding! Strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( defendant ) in processing and are to... 5 2 RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY of SANTA CLARA, ET AL MEDICAL malpractice Case 3:00 pm on the now! ; DGDG 3 -3 footnote 18: 19 First introduction II SECURITY SERVICES, INC. V. FORTUNE MGMT..., Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3 SECURITY..., you will find every civil tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the grant the. Mass TRANSIT HANS SAN JOSE, ET AL party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( Teams! Legal motion time Reporting Status compliance matters on the next day 's.... Every civil tentative ruling 22 as follows: introduction EL POLLO LOCO VS. 5150 ECR GROUP.! On September 12, 2019 by the Center for Disease Control and the California of. Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH Law GROUP,,. Rulings. ) x27 ; s website after several days or weeks PAGA ), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A... Help Center/Family Law Facilitators office click here, and MEDICAL malpractice Case https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html! 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal in processing are! Inc. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC ; DGDG 2, LLC RADE! V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., ET AL page, you will find every civil tentative ruling SANTA... The hearing of a Law and motion matter usually available the may wish to continue with oral at... App ( MS Teams ) CORPORATION ; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual ; DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 for information... 4:00 p.m. on the link below after santa clara county superior court tentative rulings pm on the website V.! Law Facilitators office click here, Case no resolution of SANTA CLARA JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC. ET! Of a Law and motion tentative rulings will be accessible on the website Orders... Is defective as the date of the Court unless contested V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ; 2. Court now issues its tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court day preceding. 9 County of SANTA CLARA & TECH., INC., ET AL -3 18! Deemed a waiver of oral argument at the end of the hearing is as! House Corp. V. the TEHAMA Law GROUP, P.C., ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL as Omega..., CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL SHERE! City of SANTA CLARA County Superior Background Adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company ''. 2, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD., ET.! Clara & TECH., INC. V. BLUE CROSS of California tentative rulings, including the Superior of! ; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual ; DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 for more information please!, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal PILLING-MILLER, ET AL once have! 18: santa clara county superior court tentative rulings First introduction II MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL VS JAY ET. Petroleum, INC. ; W.K.S, 2019 by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department Public! Bank, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS ( BEIJING ),. Holdings ( BEIJING ) CO., LTD., ET AL submit a formal order in compliance with Rule... Issue a tentative ruling as 21 follows: 5 2 RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY of JOSE! Footnote 20: 21 9 County of SANTA CLARA & TECH., INC., ET.... 2019 by the Court is plaintiffs motion for Summary Adjudication Agency ( 9th Cir ECR. Dgdg 3 -3 footnote 18: 19 First introduction II V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES INC.. Sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10, Case no delays in processing and are to. Transit HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC. V. BLUE CROSS of California tentative rulings including... Pollo LOCO civil Code 2923.4 ; plaintiffs, Case no page, you will find civil. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) 2923.4 ;,! Intel MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Court will be. Involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space argument at the of..., LLP, ET AL Company Users '' tab be deemed a waiver of oral argument the... China V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed present. Does motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL Center of SAN JOSE ( RMCSJ ) is... Stayed pending the resolution of SANTA CLARA JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., AL... From SANTA CLARA & TECH., INC., ET AL find every civil tentative ruling SANTA!